ANSWERED on Tue 1 Dec 2009 - 3:29 am UTC by easterangel
Home » Relationships and Society » #3508
Please carefully read the Disclaimer and Terms & conditions.Actions: Add Comment
Asked by mrsmapp on Mon 30 Nov 2009 - 10:10 pm UTC:
I need 5 good examples (from history) of great relationships. I'd like to get at least 1 in each of the following categories-- if not, I'll settle for more than 1 example in a category: a. love relationship b. sibling relationship c. mentor/apprentice or boss/employee d. teacher/student e. doctor/patient My question is, what made these relationships great? Why/how did they flourish? I need reasons or examples of why you would consider these on your list of greats?. Here's more info. I'm approaching this from the perspective of positive psychology. To what extent do great/flourishing relationships have any or all of the following qualities in evidence: 1. Personal Intelligence- otherwise known as self awareness (not mental or analytical intelligence). That is, the person who has a sound understanding and assessment of who they are,their strengths, their personality, and—their comfort zone. 2. Emotional Intelligence-- the person who has a sound understanding and assessment of their emotions and feelings. They are able to manage their emotions in a variety of situations (no impulsive outbursts from this person!). 3. Social Intelligence-- the person who is able to understand the emotions and feelings of others—and is able to promote smooth and effective interactions. They are good listeners and are attuned and mindful of others when engaged in conversation. They have empathy, compassion, poise, timing, charisma and political savviness- all of which can be used to help influence others.
Request for clarification by Researcher easterangel on Mon 30 Nov 2009 - 11:20 pm UTC:
Hi mrsmapp! Would the following example for love relationships fit your requirements? 1. "John Alden and Priscilla Mullins" http://www.infoplease.com/spot/love4.html 2. "Abigail and John Adams" http://www.infoplease.com/spot/love5.html 3. "Marie and Pierre Curie" http://www.infoplease.com/spot/love8.html Regards!
Question clarification by mrsmapp on Tue 1 Dec 2009 - 1:10 am UTC:
Yes- I'm sure they would be good examples. However, the task is less about factual description (they were married for 50 years, had 13 children) and more about the aspects of positivity (personal,emotional,social intelligence) that made it such a unique and wonderful relationship. This will require a bit more digging and inference. Does this help? Thanks
Request for clarification by Researcher easterangel on Tue 1 Dec 2009 - 1:15 am UTC:
Yes. I am in the process right now of digging more detailed articles that focuses on the relationship. Thanks for the quick response. Regards!
Question clarification by mrsmapp on Tue 1 Dec 2009 - 1:25 am UTC:
You can count on me for quick answers. Don't hesitate to ask me for clarification along the way. This is part of a positive psychology lesson on positive relationships-- want to provide good examples from history. Thanks
Answer by Researcher easterangel on Tue 1 Dec 2009 - 3:29 am UTC:
Hi again mrsmapp! Here are my findings great relationships in history. a. Love Relationship "Marie And Pierre Curie" http://www.mydearvalentine.com/famous-love-stories/marie-curie-and-pierre-curie.html Marie and Pierre had great love for one another as husband and wife. Marie also showed great emotional intelligence when she continued their work instead of succumbing to depression after her husband's death. ------------------------------------ b. Sibling Relationship The Wright Brothers: A Biography http://books.google.com/books?id=ckDS7qzTZqIC&dq=wright+brothers&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=k0HFmHGznM&sig=7d6w9mY3IDaN0RTCqqRCQNI6JlA&hl=en&ei=B1kUS-_DD47g7AOMrNTGBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=15&ved=0CDoQ6AEwDg#v=onepage&q=&f=false The Wright Brothers created a legacy while maintaining a close relationship through childhood. --------------------------------- c. Mentor/Apprentice or Boss/Employee Manny Pacquiao and Freddie Roach http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/sports/08pacquiao.html Manny Pacquaio was already a former champion before he met Freddie Roach. He never really knew what boxing was all about until he met his mentor and trainer. Pacquaio is now at the pinnacle of success but every time you watch him it is obvious he is still learning from his trainer amidst the success. Freddie meanwhile keeps his boxer's feet planted on the ground and protects the latter from the bad influences of success. ----------------------------------- d. Teacher / Student Anne Sullivan and Helen Keller "Helen Keller - Miracle Worker" http://www.annesullivan.ie/helenkeller.html "Helen Keller" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Keller#Early_childhood_and_illness Anne Sullivan helped Helen Keller become functional in her daily life. She shared in the struggle of her student who will become one of the most well known women in history. ------------------------------------ e. Doctor / Patient Oliver Sacks with his patient "Leonard" (alias) http://www.google.com/search?q=oliver+sacks+awakenings+"beth+abraham"+real+Leonard&btnG=Search&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&sa=2 Oliver Sacks is the real life doctor in the movie "Awakenings" which starred Robin Williams portraying Dr. Sacks and Robert De Niro as his patient named Leonard. Names are changed to preserve patient confidentiality. When Dr. Sacks experimented with the L-dopa drug on post-encephalitic patients who were suffering from the debilitating disease, it seemed like a success. But in the end the patients regressed into their former condition. Although it seems that the story is tragic, I feel that the triumph here is the compassion of the doctor on his patients by giving his all to help them live normal lives and even for a short moment experienced the wonders of everyday life, something most of us take for granted. In case you have a question as regards my answer, just ask for a clarification. Regards, Easterangel
Request for clarification by mrsmapp on Tue 1 Dec 2009 - 1:38 pm UTC:
These are excellent examples-- well done. May I ask for one more round of
work though. For each example, can you say more:
this person(s) displayed _________(self awareness, social intelligence or
emotional intelligence-- or a combination of these) by (explain how these
qualities were demonstrated)...
I need to be explicit in my lesson so that the link is clear. I also need
to be sure that I have at least one instance of self awareness, emotional
intelligence and social intelligence to cite.
FYI-- in case this helps, I'm providing a few paragraphs from my lesson on
each of these:
Self Awareness:
"Cliff has personal intelligence, that is, being able to distinguish
one’s comfort zones versus the situations that cause your blood pressure
to rise. Knowing what makes you happy and also knowing your hot buttons.
It means that you have an accurate assessment of what you do well—how you
perform in different areas versus the tasks and jobs that are best left to
others.
How does personal intelligence or self awareness fit into the
relationship equation? John Gottman, author of The Relationship Cure,
explains it as follows. Knowing that our brains are wired in various and
highly individualized ways allows us to be more compassionate and tolerant
toward ourselves and others. It helps us to build better relationships
through understanding and accepting our differences. You can either
celebrate or bemoan our differences. Work with them or against them.
Respect each other’s emotional needs. But it all starts with awareness
of who we are."
Emotional Intelligence:
Salovey identified four parts to emotional intelligence:
The first part entails identifying the emotion. Salovey describes this as
the ability to recognize emotions and express feelings—both yours and
other peoples. When you identify your feelings and put them into words,
you get a better sense of control over them. This in turn can help you cope
with negative emotions like fear, anger or sadness. By taking a deep
breath, stepping back to examine what’s going on with your feelings—it
can make all the difference in what follows next. The second component of
emotional intelligence is using the emotion. This is your ability to
channel emotions for creative use, reasoning, decision making and problem
solving. It means you have an ability to redirect and prioritize your
thinking based on your emotions; you can capitalize on mood changes to
appreciate multiple points of view and you can use your emotional states to
facilitate problem solving and creativity. In other words, your emotions
are used productively, to your advantage. Salovey’s third component of
emotional intelligence involves understanding the cause of the emotion.
This is having insight and knowledge of one’s feelings or the feelings of
others. It’s the ability to label your emotions with words and to
understand the causes and consequences of emotions. Annoyance and
irritation can lead to rage if the provocative stimulus is not eliminated.
How to quell emotions before they get out of hand… or how to let the air
out of a balloon before it bursts.
The fourth and final component is managing your emotions using a broad
range of techniques to regulate your moods. It may start with simply being
open to your feelings—both pleasant and unpleasant—to monitor and
reflect on them—what is happening here… why do I feel this way.
Physical exercise is thought to be the single most effective strategy for
changing a bad mood, among those under your control. It also can help to
listen to music, engage in social activities and other pleasant
distractions, or simply to give yourself a pep talk. All of these serve to
help you manage your emotions and avoid impulsive reactions and
consequences that you may later regret.
Social Intelligence:
Ten years after his seminal work on emotional intelligence, Daniel Goleman
followed up on his study of relationships with his book Social
Intelligence, the new science of human relationships. Like Gottman and
Harvey, Goleman speaks of the human qualities behind harmonious
interactions… the qualities of those who are able to consistently engage
in pleasant, engaged and smooth connections with other people. Chances
are, they possess some or all of the following strengths:
1. Empathy—sensing and understanding another person’s thoughts,
feelings and intentions. Being able to pick up clues from verbal and non
verbal signals such as the facial expression or tone of voice.
2. Attunement—listening with full receptivity. Deep listening--wanting
to understand the other person. Asking insightful questions to help
“paint the picture” in your mind.
3. Social awareness—knowing how the social world works—being savvy in
social situations, being able to read “vibes” within a group, and
helping to find solutions to social dilemma’s.
4. Self presentation- presenting ourselves effectively. Having charisma
and timing, confidence, pose and savior-faire. This is the person who has
their emotions under control and is able to modulate their impulses in a
variety of social situations.
Thanks very much for the speed and quality of your work.
Answer clarification by Researcher easterangel on Tue 1 Dec 2009 - 10:11 pm UTC:
Hi again mrsmapp! I will try my best to explain each part of the answer. a. Marie And Pierre Curie The couple had great love for one another and when Pierre died, Marie shows greater "emotional intelligence" by continuing their scientific work. Instead of feeling overwhelmed with grief, Marie channeled her emotions to being useful in this world and thereby leaving a legacy along with her dead husband. b. The Wright Brothers Usually familiarity breeds contempt and what can be more familiar than being blood brothers. However; this did not became a hinder to the Wright brothers in achieving their childhood dreams and thereby forever changing the world with their airplanes. I think the brothers here showed great emotional and social intelligence as well since they could have easily broke up because of the pressure to produce quality work and the eventual fame. c. Manny Pacquiao and Freddie Roach Pacquiao and Roach are very self-aware individuals when it comes to boxing. Pacquiao knows he has much to learn as a boxer while Roach realizes he has a ultra talented boxer who does not just need training but a father figure in the latter's life. Pacquiao is aware that he is still a student in the world of boxing so even with fame at his feet, he still listens to the coach. Roach meanwhile understands the needs of his boxer and respects his talent. In their last fight, Roach allowed Manny to deviate from a fight plan since he realizes that his talented boxer has now learn to adjust and think in the ring. These two have a humble perspective in boxing. I also realize that they show great social intelligence as well. Even though they are such successful individuals, they still train hard and study hard for fights. In the last fight there were lots of distraction brought on by fame but the intensity of their training never wavered. d. Anne Sullivan and Helen Keller Social Intelligence is the main weapon of both Anne Sullivan and Helen Keller. In a world that they could have easily gave up due to their disability, they prodded along by learning how society works and excelling in their respective fields. Ms. Sullivan showed both social and emotional intelligence by patiently teaching Ms. Keller to be functional and by being a great friend for her in spite of her disability. Ms. Keller meanwhile displayed the same qualities when she did not give up and moreover did her best under immense difficulty to function with a physical handicap. e. Oliver Sacks with his patient "Leonard" (alias) Empathy is the part of social intelligence I see in Dr. Oliver Sacks whenever he is treating his patients. Unlike other doctors who simply go through the motions of ordinary medical care, Dr. Sacks actually tried to do something about the quality of life of his patients. His patient Leonard meanwhile also displays great social intelligence when he came out of his shell and tried to do something out of his life once he got better. It showed perseverance even under difficult circumstances. I hope that this clarification will be of help. Regards!
Actions: Add Comment
|
Frequently Asked Questions | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Spread the word! © 2010 Uclue Ltd |
Comment by User johnfrommelbourne on Tue 1 Dec 2009 - 4:57 am UTC: